In mid-April 2025, something shocking happened in the crypto world — the price of a popular token called OM, which belongs to the blockchain project MANTRA, suddenly dropped by over 90% in just a few hours. This unexpected crash left traders panicking, wiped out millions of dollars, and sparked a lot of confusion about what really went wrong.
What are OM and MANTRA?
OM is the native token (like a special coin) of the MANTRA blockchain, which is a project focused on real-world asset tokenization. In other words, the conversion of real estate or government bonds into digital tokens to be traded on the blockchain.
Before the crash, OM had been doing really well. There was an over 800% increase in its price in one year, and it had partnerships, a big community, and even licenses from regulatory bodies like VARA (in Dubai). Many believed this was a solid, growing project.
What happened?
On April 13, 2025, OM was trading at around $6.3 — but within hours, its price dropped to around $0.37. This crash happened very suddenly and took many people by surprise. There was automatic liquidation of over $71 million worth of investments. OM’s total market value dropped from almost $6 billion to under $700 million.
What are “Liquidations” and why do they matter?
Many crypto traders use leverage, which means they borrow extra money to make bigger bets. But if the price of their token drops too much, their position is automatically closed to prevent bigger losses — this is called forced liquidation.
Think of it like this: If you borrow money to invest, and the value of your investment falls too much, the lender (the crypto exchange) will sell your position to get their money back. If a lot of people get liquidated at once, it can cause prices to fall even more, like a chain reaction.
That’s what seems to have happened with OM.
The CEO of MANTRA, John Patrick Mullin, blamed centralized exchanges (CEXs) like Binance and OKX for the crash, stating that they triggered forced liquidations too quickly and during a low-activity period, which caused a rapid price collapse. He insisted that neither the MANTRA team nor early investors sold any tokens, calling the crash both unfair and avoidable. However, exchanges like OKX and Binance shared a different view. Their internal data and blockchain analysis showed large amounts of OM tokens being moved to exchanges in the days leading up to the crash. This was a possible signal of planned sell-offs. OKX also highlighted that OM had unusual tokenomics, with most of the supply concentrated in a few wallets, making the market more vulnerable to volatility.
Tokenomics
Here’s a key point that might have caused the crash: just one wallet held 90% of all OM tokens. That means only about 10% of the total supply was available to trade. If even a few big holders decide to sell, it can crash the price, because there’s not enough demand or liquidity to handle it. It’s like trying to sell a lot of gold in a small market — the price will fall quickly if there aren’t enough buyers.
Were big investors selling?
Blockchain analysts spotted 17 wallets that moved about 43.6 million OM tokens (worth around $227 million) to exchanges right before the crash. Some of these wallets were believed to be linked to well-known investment firms like Laser Digital (Nomura) and Shorooq Partners. However, these firms denied selling anything and showed proof that their tokens were still locked.
The MANTRA CEO also claimed these wallets were wrongly labeled, and that the tokens weren’t actually sold.
A pump-and-dump
Many in the crypto community began to suspect that this might have been a “pump-and-dump”. This is a tactic where a token’s price is pushed up (pumped) by hype, and then big holders sell off (dump), leaving small investors with heavy losses.
While there’s no solid proof yet that this was intentional, the crash revealed serious flaws in OM’s structure:
- Too much control by a few wallets
- Limited supply in the market
- Poor liquidity
- Lack of clear communication and transparency
Lessons for crypto investors
A crypto trader, be it a beginner or someone who is experienced, needs to take some lessons from this episode. It’s important to note if one wallet controls most of the tokens, that’s a red flag. Likewise, it’s necessary to understand that just because a token is going up fast doesn’t mean it’s safe. Thirdly, projects should communicate clearly about token locks, investor holdings, and upcoming changes. Most important, however, is to take heed that liquidations can wipe you out fast if the market moves against you.
What’s next for OM and MANTRA?
The MANTRA team has promised to be more transparent going forward and is planning a community session to explain what happened. The OM token has recovered slightly, now trading above $1, but it’s still far below its previous high. Whether investors regain trust depends on how the team handles this crisis and if they improve on how the project is run. Rebuilding confidence won’t be easy.
Also Read
How geopolitics and macroeconomics are reshaping the crypto world
